Make consequential intelligence measurable, auditable and accountable.
Our work starts where a model output becomes an allocation, clinical alert, engineering action or institutional decision. We focus on the gap between what a system scores and what it actually changes.
Three connected questions.
The domains differ; the research logic is the same: evaluate the decision chain, not only the model output.
AI Evaluation & Decision Systems
Question: When do apparently equivalent systems act differently?
Selection identity · execution provenance · evaluator robustness · consequential evaluation.Explore RIDI →Biomedical Knowledge & Drug Safety
Question: How does incomplete or misrepresented evidence alter clinical prioritisation?
Drug identity · DDI completeness · clinical relevance · negative controls · evidence grading.Open ANTI-DDI →Generative AI, Judgment & Education
Question: How can AI scale learning and design without erasing context, evidence or human judgment?
Defensible judgment · fidelity debt · cultural calibration · computing education.Teaching systems →Measure. Trace. Stress. Translate.
We use a simple research discipline across domains.
Look beyond average performance to the items, evidence or people whose outcomes actually change.
Preserve provenance, assumptions, dependencies and evidence so the result can be inspected.
Change the condition, boundary or dependency and observe whether the decision still holds.
Release the result as a paper, reproducible artifact, public system, institutional pilot or protected invention.
Ideas are stronger when they can be inspected.
Selected systems and artifacts that make the research operational.

RIDI
Audits selection change and the identity–utility frontier when ranking systems become decisions.
Interactive demo →
HealthX
Governed AI middleware for auditable, policy-aware clinical-IP workflows.
Institutional IP reviewPublic research page →
MIYAR
Governed workforce intelligence with occupational-taxonomy compliance and auditable decision trails.
Institutional IP reviewPublic prototype →
iSCARB
A course-level system for defensible engineering judgment in the generative-AI era.
Explore the system →Led by Adeeb Noor.
Professor of Data Science & AI at King Abdulaziz University. Projects bring together students, co-authors, domain experts and institutional collaborators according to the research question.
Bring a hard question and evidence worth testing.
We are most interested in collaborations where the problem, evidence source and expected contribution are explicit.
Research should survive outside the paper.
Explore the research record, reproduce an artifact, or propose a collaboration.