Skip to content
Funders

Fund a testable question and an accountable decision.

Three research directions connected to an existing body of work, with a clear boundary between documented record and what still needs co-design.

For funders

Fund the question before the tool

The common thesis is simple: a score is not a decision. The research asks where identity, context and evidence are lost when metrics become decisions about people.

Research record

40+ peer-reviewed publications are represented in the current CV record; citation count and h-index remain dynamic and are delegated to Google Scholar.

Academic CV →

Research to application

The CV records KAUST TAQADAM venture support for precision medicine in 2016 and a FekraTech innovation award/grant for emergency-department optimization in 2017.

Full CV →

Institutional scale

The CV reports program portfolios of approximately SAR 190M shaped or overseen; the figure is presented with its defined scope and source rather than as an independently audited financial claim.

Scope & source →

Ready for discussion

Three research programs to shape with the funder

Duration, team, budget and partners are intentionally not invented here; they are set after aligning a program with a specific funding call.

Justice beyond aggregate performance

Compare equivalent-performing systems at the level of affected individuals, then examine which changes are necessary, avoidable or unjustified.

Question & research foundation →

Accountability through inspectable evidence

Trace how changes in source data, terminology or evidence alter a recommendation, and evaluate whether the resulting explanation supports meaningful review.

Question & research foundation →

Human agency and limits of delegation

Evaluate when people can detect a system’s limits, challenge its advice and revise their decisions under changed conditions.

Question & research foundation →

Privacy & analytics preferences